PrestaShop vs Endora Commerce — which one to pick for B2B

When a Polish distributor goes looking for a selling platform, PrestaShop makes the shortlist almost every time, and for good reasons. It is a mature open-source system written in PHP that holds one of the strongest positions of any platform in Poland: over 15 thousand active stores and a market of implementers deep enough that you will find an agency in every larger city. The code is yours, you pick your own hosting, and the module catalog (the official Addons store alone lists over 3 thousand items, and beyond it sits an entire market of Polish vendors) covers practically any shop requirement. In February 2026 PrestaShop was acquired by the cyber_Folks group together with Sylius and BitBag. The platform’s owner now sits in Poznań rather than Paris, bringing around 230 thousand active stores worldwide into the group.

The difference between PrestaShop and Endora Commerce starts at the point of origin. PrestaShop was built as a retail shop engine and it is still built that way today. Business-to-business selling happens in two ways. The first is B2B mode: a toggle in customer settings that adds company fields, an authorized outstanding allowance, a maximum number of payment days and a risk rating to the customer record. The second is customer groups with their own prices, discounts and catalog visibility. That works, and it covers a sensible slice of price-list wholesale. Everything beyond that set gets bolted on with modules: quote requests, price negotiation, role-dependent catalogs, hiding products per group, branch hierarchies.

Endora Commerce went the other way: the buyer is an organization, the price comes from a contract, an order can be the outcome of a negotiation, and retail selling runs as an additional channel on the same data model. This piece is mostly about what you get for a comparable budget, because the conclusion that surprises people most often is this: at B2B scope both platforms land in the same price bracket. So every criterion below covers both PrestaShop’s advantages and Endora’s, followed by concrete scenarios and a checklist.

The short version

If you only read three sentences: pick PrestaShop when you want to launch fast and cheap, your B2B can be described as “wholesale from a price list”, and your integration list matches what the Polish module market already handles. Pick Endora when business-to-business selling is your main business: prices are negotiated, the customer structure is a tree, and the order process has steps of its own. Then the budget that PrestaShop spends on building B2B out of modules is spent in Endora on fitting existing B2B to your process. If you already run a working PrestaShop store with an implementer who knows it, then migrating without a calculated reason is a bad investment.

What each platform actually is

PrestaShop

PrestaShop is a PHP application on MySQL or MariaDB, developed since 2007 and released under an open licence. PrestaShop 9, released in June 2025, is the current major release. The entire back office moved to Symfony 6.4 LTS. An Admin API with OAuth authentication was added, along with a CQRS architecture in the backend layer and a new default theme, Hummingbird, built on Bootstrap 5 with native WebP and AVIF support. Requirements run from PHP 8.1 to 8.4, with MySQL from 5.7 (8.0+ recommended) or MariaDB from 10.4. Release 9.1 from April 2026 added PHP 8.5 compatibility, simpler discount management and security hardening. Vendor benchmarks put version 9 at roughly 28–29% faster page loads and 21% lower peak memory usage than PrestaShop 8, largely thanks to the newer PHP.

In the B2B layer PrestaShop gives you less natively than the size of the ecosystem suggests. B2B mode is switched on with a toggle in customer settings. It adds fields to the customer record: company, the French equivalents of a tax ID and a business activity code (SIRET and APE), website, authorized outstanding allowance, maximum number of payment days and a risk rating, plus a separate outstanding listing. On top of that come customer groups (each with its own price multiplier, price visibility and category access) and a specific-price table where you can define a price for a single customer, product, currency or country. That is a real toolkit and plenty for many wholesalers.

What is not in that toolkit: quote requests and price negotiation, catalogs that depend on the buyer’s role in their company, branch hierarchies with inherited terms, order approval on the buyer’s side, packaging units with unit conversion. All of that comes from Addons modules or gets written to order.

Endora Commerce

Endora Commerce is a B2B platform written in TypeScript: a Fastify backend with MikroORM and Zod contracts, a server-rendered Next.js storefront, and a React admin panel. Data lives in PostgreSQL, cache and queues in Redis with BullMQ, search in Meilisearch. Over 60 modules ship as standard: from catalog and price lists to KSeF e-invoicing, product feeds and an AI assistant in the admin panel.

It is not a B2B-only platform. B2C selling runs on the same installation and the same data model: registering an individual customer quietly creates a one-person organization, so orders, quote requests, invoices and addresses all follow exactly the same path as in B2B. There is no parallel, simplified mode that starts drifting from the rest after six months. B2C is switched on per sales channel.

The delivery model matches PrestaShop’s in one important respect: the code is yours. In everything else it differs. You do not download a package and install it yourself: you get a platform rolled out around your processes, with the code in your own Git repository and the data in your own database. The first working prototype takes four weeks, and an average rollout lands in the region of PLN 60–80k, excluding integrations with external systems, which are quoted separately.

Performance

This conversation has to be split into two questions, because the answers differ.

The anonymous catalog

Here a tuned PrestaShop is fast and there is no point pretending otherwise. Version 9 is quicker than version 8, the Hummingbird theme serves images as WebP and AVIF, and jQuery loads deferred. Caching can be layered at several levels: the Smarty cache, an object cache in Redis and full-page Varnish in front of the application. A public catalog with prices visible to everyone is the scenario PrestaShop has been working in for well over a decade, with well-worn optimization playbooks.

Endora renders the storefront server-side in Next.js, with Core Web Vitals targets written directly into the platform requirements (LCP under 2.5 s, INP under 200 ms, CLS under 0.1) and search under 200 ms at the 95th percentile. The demo runs on a catalog of more than 120k SKUs, and generating a product feed for 100,000 products produces a 38 MB file with peak memory usage below 20 MB, because serialization is streamed.

A catalog with per-customer prices

And here the picture gets complicated, which is precisely everyday life in B2B.

In PrestaShop individual prices live in the specific-price table, where one row describes a combination of product, variant, shop, currency, country, group and customer. With a few hundred companies on their own terms and a catalog counted in tens of thousands of items, that table can grow to a size where it becomes the bottleneck. It is a problem documented on PrestaShop forums for years, one that resurfaces at every larger wholesaler.

A second issue compounds it: the full-page cache has to be varied by customer group, so the more groups with their own prices, the more variants of the same page and the more often you hit a cold one. The back office is a separate thread. The product grid on a catalog of around a hundred thousand items can be painful, because the listing queries rely on SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS, deprecated in MySQL 8.0.17 and extremely inefficient on large sets.

All of this can be worked around, and companies do work around it: stronger hardware, a tuned MySQL, Redis, Varnish, search moved to Elasticsearch. The practical ceiling for a well-maintained PrestaShop is a catalog in the 50–200k product range on 4–8 vCPU and 16–32 GB RAM. That is achievable, but it is the result of optimization work, not the state you get after installation.

Endora does not have this problem structurally, because it does not base its performance on a full-page cache. The price is resolved by the pricing engine on every request: from the group price list, the individual contract, the quantity break and the time window, with deterministic resolution when rules overlap. Rules are described in a condition builder across channel, group, organization, category and currency, with AND and OR operators nested up to five levels deep. A quote fetched through the API goes through the same engine as the cart, so the two agree to the penny. Personalization is not an exception to the optimization here, it is the base case.

The hardware needed to run it

A caveat: PrestaShop has well over a decade of rollouts behind it and very well mapped bottlenecks. For every performance problem there is a write-up, a patch and a consultant who has fixed it before. Endora’s numbers are architectural targets confirmed by tests and by the scale of the demo, not a decade of production peak seasons.

Rollout and running cost

Let us run the numbers on a concrete case

A wholesaler with 300 business customers, a catalog of around 40k items, individual price lists, quote requests and an integration with Comarch ERP Optima. Horizon: three years. Amounts are net, and the exchange rate assumed throughout is EUR 1 = PLN 4.30.

The gap comes out at roughly PLN 38k over three years. And now the most important sentence in this section: that is not a difference you should base a decision on. Published ranges for Polish B2B rollouts on PrestaShop run from PLN 50k to 130k, which means the same project quoted by a different implementer could land at 60k or at 120k. Thirty-eight thousand fits inside the uncertainty of either estimate. The conclusion is not “Endora is cheaper”. It is this: at the same B2B scope both platforms are in the same budget bracket, so the question stops being about price and starts being about what the money buys.

And it buys different things. In PrestaShop a significant part of the budget goes into building B2B on a retail engine: role-dependent pricing rules, a quote request module, a workaround for branch hierarchies, a module for a credit limit that works differently from the outstanding balance in B2B mode. In Endora those pieces are in the core, so the budget goes into fitting existing B2B to your process, and into integrations. The second difference is how the cost is spread over time: the “licence renewals”, “keeping modules compatible” and “major upgrade” lines in PrestaShop recur and grow with the number of modules you rely on.

A caveat on the other side: for a simple store this calculation looks entirely different and lands decisively in PrestaShop’s favour. A retail shop on an off-the-shelf theme with a handful of modules can be launched for a few thousand to a bit over ten thousand zloty, on shared hosting, in a few weeks. Endora has no equivalent of that option. Its floor is a rollout project.

Ease of extending the platform

This criterion is best tested on concrete tasks rather than on declarations.

Upgrades between major versions deserve their own paragraph, because they are the most underestimated line in a PrestaShop maintenance budget. Going from 8 to 9 is not a version bump. The back office moved to Symfony 6.4, a number of admin controllers were rewritten, and back-office templates were converted from Smarty to Twig. Some hooks tied to the controller lifecycle stopped being called, and libraries that modules depended on were dropped from the core: Guzzle, SwiftMailer, Tactician and pear/archive_tar. Any module overriding a legacy admin controller simply stops working.

Official estimates and implementer experience agree on the order of magnitude: a simple store takes 3–5 days, a complex one 1–3 months, and migrating a single custom module from PS8 to PS9 usually takes 2–5 days of work. Old versions cannot be migrated directly. The path runs through 1.7, then 8, then 9.

This is not an argument against PrestaShop, just a line that belongs in the budget. The risk scales directly with the number of third-party modules. With three plugins it is a formality. With fifteen it is a project in which you have to find out whether each of the fifteen vendors shipped a version compatible with the new major release, and what to do about the ones who did not.

Module quality is worth stating plainly too. The market is enormous, which is its greatest strength, but the spread in quality is just as wide. Alongside modules maintained for years, with documentation and support, sit ones whose last update landed back in the PrestaShop 1.7 era. There is nothing unusual about that, because every large marketplace looks like this. In practice, though, it means that picking a module is an architectural decision, not a purchase. It pays to check the last update date, the declared 9.x compatibility, and whether the vendor has a track record of shipping releases across previous major upgrades.

On PrestaShop’s side there is an advantage that cannot be argued away: the implementer market. You can hire or contract PHP and Symfony developers in every larger city, there are dozens of PrestaShop agencies in Poland, and changing partner is a tender rather than a rewrite. Endora hands you the code, but you will not find a team that knows the platform from the inside off the first job ad. That is softened by the code being plain TypeScript with Zod contracts and generated documentation rather than a bespoke framework, but it is not eliminated.

One thing only works in one direction: the Endora admin panel has an AI assistant. You open the command palette, describe in plain language what should happen, and the assistant shows a plan and executes it after your confirmation, within your permissions and with an entry in the audit log.

There is a number behind that, because “fast” on its own means nothing: a less complex module takes 1-3 days in Endora, a larger one up to a week. That excludes integrations with an ERP, WMS, CRM, PIM or OMS: those are always heavily bespoke, and writing one takes up to two weeks. Those are always heavily bespoke and can take considerably longer. This is not an advantage over open code as such, because there you can write whatever you want too. It is an advantage of the starting point: you add a module to a working B2B platform instead of first building the thing that is meant to be extended.

Integrations with external systems

In B2B this is usually the deciding criterion, because the platform is almost never the source of truth. The ERP is, with a CRM, a WMS and increasingly an OMS alongside it.

Where PrestaShop wins

The Polish integration ecosystem. This is PrestaShop’s strongest card and it belongs on the table first. Allegro, Ceneo, BaseLinker, InPost, DPD, DHL, GLS, parcel lockers, Przelewy24, PayU, tpay, integrations with Subiekt GT and Nexo, Comarch ERP Optima, WAPRO Mag, Symfonia. For every one of those systems there is more than one ready connector, often from several competing vendors, with Polish support and a local invoice. Add to that middleware platforms covering dozens of systems at once. If your system list fits inside that set, in PrestaShop you genuinely buy the integration instead of commissioning it, and the rollout is counted in days.

The second advantage is the number of people who have already done it. Integrating PrestaShop with Optima has been done hundreds of times, and whoever configures it for you probably knows every pitfall before you hit it.

Where Endora wins

A shorter list of off-the-shelf pieces, but a stronger contract and the important things natively.

What matters most is that the list is not closed and does not need to be. Endora’s integration layer is generic: there is no list of “supported ERPs”, there is a documented contract: a partner API, signed webhooks and encrypted vendor configurations. As a result any ERP, CRM, WMS or OMS is wired in as an adapter module, whether it is Comarch, SAP, IFS, an in-house system written twenty years ago, or a platform nobody has heard of yet. The adapter registers itself with the platform, gets its own settings and permissions, and the core stays untouched.

The specifics this layer stands on:

• Comarch ERP Optima and Subiekt GT. Adapters as standard: item records, stock, prices and sales documents.
• KSeF in the platform core. Invoices and credit notes in the FA(3) format, mandatory since 1 February 2026, sent through a durable queue, with the KSeF number on the document, the receipt confirmation available for download and a verification QR code on the PDF. PrestaShop has no KSeF in the core: the built-in invoicing module does not handle Polish e-invoicing, so you go through a module that integrates an external invoicing service or through a dedicated service. Either way you add another subscription and another point of failure.
• A partner API with live OpenAPI. The document is generated from the contracts in the code, so your integrator is not working from an outdated PDF.
• An API key pinned to an organization and a channel. The integration sees exactly that company’s prices and limits and can do no more than its own buyer. There is no parameter that bypasses the rules.
• Idempotent orders. A repeated request returns the same order, never a second one. That holds for concurrent repeats too.
• Webhooks signed with HMAC-SHA-256, up to eight attempts with growing backoff, and a separate view of failed deliveries with manual retry.
• Bulk quoting. A single request prices up to 200 line items for a specific organization, guaranteed to match the cart to the penny.
• Credentials encrypted with AES-256-GCM, tested on save, masked on read and redacted in the audit log.

The difference in philosophy comes down to this: in PrestaShop you more often buy an integration, in Endora you more often write it. You write it as an adapter module, though, in your own repository, without the risk that the next major platform release will collide with someone else’s plugin. If your ERP is a popular one, the advantage is PrestaShop’s and it is a clear one. If it is in-house, ageing or heavily modified (as it often is in Polish manufacturing), the advantage shifts to Endora, because you are writing code either way, just in a cleaner place.

There is one more difference that only shows up in B2B: Endora’s integration contract understands the concept of an organization. An API key pinned to a company sees its price list, its credit limit and its range. A distributor’s ordering portal or an integration with a customer’s system therefore operates on exactly the same terms as that customer’s buyer, without building a separate permission layer on the integrator’s side.

B2B: where Endora Commerce genuinely stands out

Let me start with what PrestaShop actually does in B2B, because the list is longer than most people judging it from the outside assume. Natively you get B2B mode with company fields on the customer record, an authorized outstanding allowance, a maximum number of payment days, a risk rating and an outstanding listing. On top of that, customer groups with their own price multiplier, a price visibility toggle and category access control. Then specific prices defined down to a single customer and product, with quantity breaks, hiding prices from anonymous visitors, and separate payment and shipping methods per group. Addons modules cover the rest: quote requests with counter-offers, company registration with sales approval, role-dependent catalogs, shopping lists, quick ordering. For a wholesaler selling from a price list to regular customers, that is a complete set.

The difference shows up where selling stops being a variant of retail. And it is not about the length of the feature list, it is about whether a given thing is the model or a layer on top of it.

1. Quote requests as a full negotiation loop in the core. In PrestaShop RFQ is a module. It works, but it lives beside the order model and usually ends at “the customer asks, sales replies, someone retypes the line items into an order”. In Endora it is the core: the customer submits a request, sales quotes it with a lead time and a validity period, both sides can modify the terms, and an accepted quote turns into an order without retyping a single line. On top of that comes the none price display mode, which hides every pricing element and routes purchase intent to a quote request. It is there for ranges that are never sold from a price list on principle.

2. Organization hierarchy with inherited commercial terms. PrestaShop models a business customer as an account with company fields and an assigned group. That is a flat structure: there is no tree for terms to flow down. In Endora headquarters and branches form a tree: order visibility flows downwards, and the price list and credit limit are inherited from the nearest ancestor. A company with twenty branches does not need twenty parallel configurations or twenty customer groups.

3. A credit limit, not an outstanding balance computed after the fact. The authorized outstanding allowance in PrestaShop is a value on the customer record and an outstanding report. That is information, not a mechanism. Endora reserves the limit atomically at the moment the order is placed and releases it once the invoice is paid or the order cancelled, and once the limit is exhausted it filters the available payment methods. That is the difference between knowing about risk and controlling it.

4. Your own order lifecycle and fields that come from contracts. In PrestaShop you can add statuses in the admin, but transition logic and business events mean a module. In Endora statuses, transitions and the events attached to them are configured in the admin, and extra fields are added to orders, organizations, customers, categories, products and quote requests as data, with no database migration and no code deployment.

5. The sales channel as a first-class dimension. Storefront, marketplace, distributor portal, mobile app and POS are separate channels of the same installation, with their own products, prices, promotions, content, settings, analytics and search index. The PrestaShop equivalent is multistore. It works, but it is a shop-level feature rather than a dimension of the data model, and once the ranges start diverging it quickly needs maintaining separately.

6. The realities of wholesale ordering handled directly. Packaging units with unit conversion carried through to the order and the quote. Cart approval enabled per organization, with a decision and a justification. Cart import from CSV or Excel, search by SKU and attributes, one-click purchase for customers with a full set of default preferences. Shopping lists, a comparison tool with PDF export, returns and complaints with RMA numbering and credit notes, multi-warehouse stock with reservations and backorders.

There is also something that does not show up on a feature list: every sensitive operation lands in the audit log with the state before and after the change. Permissions are checked server-side, and a sales rep can step into a customer’s context and see the prices the way that customer sees them, with a visible banner and a log entry.

Where PrestaShop has the advantage inside B2B itself: in how quickly you can start. B2B mode is one toggle, customer groups with their own prices can be configured in an hour, and a quote request module from Addons costs a few hundred euro and runs the same day. If your B2B really does fit the sentence “regular customers buy at their own prices and pay by deferred transfer”, PrestaShop will handle it faster and more cheaply than any bespoke rollout. Add to that the ability to add features incrementally: you buy a module, try it, uninstall it if it does not fit. A rollout model offers no such path.

When PrestaShop is the better choice

1. You already run a working PrestaShop store with an implementer who knows it. Replatforming without a calculated business reason is one of the most expensive ways to achieve nothing. If the problems can be solved by optimization, an upgrade to version 9 or a single module, stay.

2. Your B2B is wholesale from a price list. Regular customers, assigned groups and prices, deferred payments, repeat orders, no negotiation. B2B mode and customer groups cover that natively.

3. Retail matters as much as wholesale, or more. A public catalog, prices visible to everyone, campaigns, seasonal peaks. That is the environment PrestaShop was designed for, with ready support for Allegro, Ceneo and price comparison engines.

4. Your integration list matches the Polish standard. Optima or Subiekt, InPost and couriers, Allegro, BaseLinker, a common payment gateway. Buying five ready connectors is faster and cheaper than commissioning five adapters, and you will find an implementer immediately.

5. The starting budget is small and has to stay small. A store on an off-the-shelf theme with a few modules can launch for a few thousand to a bit over ten thousand zloty. Endora has no equivalent of that option.

6. You want an easily replaceable vendor. The PrestaShop agency market in Poland is deep. Changing partner is a tender rather than a rewrite. The same goes for hiring a developer into your team.

7. You want to add features one at a time and see whether they earn their place. The module model lets you buy, test and back out. A bespoke rollout requires the decision to be made earlier.

When Endora Commerce is the better choice

1. Selling runs through negotiation, not through a cart. Quote requests are the main path, part of the range has no displayed price at all, and the quote is often modified by both sides before acceptance.

2. Your customer structure is a tree. Corporate groups, headquarters with branches, price list and credit limit inherited from the nearest ancestor, order visibility flowing down the structure. Reproducing that with customer groups ends in multiplied configuration.

3. The credit limit has to actually block, not just inform. The limit reserved when the order is placed, released once the invoice is paid, payment methods filtered once the limit is exhausted.

4. The order process has steps of its own. Technical verification, approval at the buyer’s side, production, picking, partial releases. Business events are wired into the transitions and configured in the admin rather than commissioned from a vendor.

5. Your pricing rules are unusual. Group price lists, individual contracts, quantity breaks, time windows and conditions across channel, organization, category and currency with AND and OR operators. On top of that, deterministic resolution when rules overlap.

6. You are launching a distributor portal or several channels at once. A separate range, prices, content and search index for each channel from one admin panel, plus an API key pinned to an organization and a channel for integration traffic.

7. You have a system nobody supports off the shelf. An in-house ERP, an ageing WMS, an OMS assembled from several tools. Endora’s integration layer does not assume a specific product on the other side. You write the adapter once, in your own repository.

8. KSeF should be part of the platform, not another subscription. Invoices and credit notes in the FA(3) format sent from the platform, the KSeF number on the document, the receipt confirmation and QR code on the PDF, with no intermediary invoicing service.

9. You want to validate the idea before signing off a large budget. A workshop and a clickable prototype on your own data after four weeks, then a joint decision about the full rollout.

What Endora Commerce does not have

This section is here so that the piece can be used to make a decision, not just to feel convinced.

• An extension marketplace. You cannot buy a ready plugin for 300 euro, test it over a weekend and uninstall it if it does not fit. Every unusual feature is development work.
• A deep specialist market. PrestaShop has dozens of agencies in Poland and a broad market of PHP developers. Endora is developed with a partner or your own TypeScript team, who have to learn the platform.
• More than a decade of references. PrestaShop has been through thousands of rollouts and all of their pathologies. Endora’s numbers are architectural targets confirmed by tests and by the scale of the demo.
• A “small shop for a few thousand” option. The floor is a rollout project. If you are looking for a store on an off-the-shelf theme for a bit over ten thousand zloty, this is not the offer.
• Full marketplace API integrations. Allegro, Amazon and eBay are handled today through feed templates rather than a two-way integration with the marketplace API. PrestaShop has ready modules here and that is a real advantage.
• Upkeep bundled into a single price. Somebody has to maintain the server, the backups and the updates. That applies to both platforms, but with PrestaShop it is easier to buy as a hosting service. You can run that yourself, or contract it to us or to a partner firm under an SLA.

A short checklist

Answer these questions for yourself. The answers usually line up on one side.

1. Do your customers ask for a price before ordering, or do they buy at prices already assigned to them?
2. Is your customer structure flat, or does it have headquarters and branches inheriting terms?
3. Should the credit limit block an order, or is it enough for it to show up in a report?
4. How many of your systems have a ready PrestaShop module, and how many would need writing in either scenario?
5. How many third-party modules are you willing to maintain across every major upgrade?
6. Does your order process have steps that cannot be called “paid” and “shipped”?
7. What is your starting budget: around ten thousand zloty or several tens of thousands?
8. Should KSeF live inside the platform, or can it live in an external invoicing service?

A majority of “selling from a price list”, “flat customer structure”, “common integrations”, “small starting budget”, “we want an implementer from the open market” points to PrestaShop. A majority of “we negotiate prices”, “branches with inherited terms”, “the limit has to block”, “an unusual order process”, “an in-house ERP” points to Endora. If the answers split evenly, the deciding factor is usually the number of modules you would have to buy and maintain for PrestaShop to do what you need.

Summary

PrestaShop and Endora Commerce share a foundation: open code that stays with you, and no revenue-based fees. They diverge in where they start. PrestaShop gives you a mature shop engine with a huge ecosystem, the strongest set of ready integrations in Poland and an implementer available immediately. Business-to-business selling is built on top of it from B2B mode, customer groups and modules, and you pay for that in maintenance complexity and in the cost of every major upgrade. Endora gives you a platform designed around business-to-business selling, with quote requests, organization hierarchy, credit limits and a configurable order lifecycle in the core. You pay for that in the platform’s youth, a narrower specialist market and the absence of a “small shop for a few thousand” option.

The simplest test: if your B2B can be described as “wholesale from a price list”, PrestaShop will handle it faster and more cheaply. If the description includes “we negotiate”, “branches have their own terms” or “our orders go through”, it is worth running the numbers on the other option, because at that scope the budgets are comparable, and the difference comes down to how much of your process is in the platform and how much has to be bought on top.

Endora’s admin panel and storefront are available online, so the quickest route is to click through the demo yourself or book a free workshop, where we go through your processes and systems, then scope the first rollout together with the integrations.

And if it turns out from that conversation that PrestaShop is the better choice, we will say so plainly. A failed rollout is not a good reference for anyone.